API or not API: addins vs Dynamo in Revit

A recent thread on RevitForum.org makes me think of a few things regarding API stuff in Revit.
As a Revit user, I would love to be able to solve my every day problems with some code, like Harry Mattisson from BoostYourBIM do. But I don’t have that skill yet. I plan to, but it will take time as I don’t have any programming background. Thinking further, I have some ammo in my pocket: I learn Dynamo. The RFO thread sounded like a challenge to me. I was confident it can be achieve with Dynamo, and it was also a way to learn a bit more. Solving problems makes you learn a lot.

Main
You will find here a definition that allows user to retrieve the XYZ position and Mark parameter from a collection of family instances. You write this in an Excel worksheet, then you add informations in Excel. When done, you read this data and push it to the Family instances back, into the choosen parameters. There’s still some manual process involved. And a limitation: each time data you read change in Revit, you have to close Dynamo and re open it.

You will need some packages to make it work properly.

manual

all
Paolo Emilio Serra demonstrate it can be done with an API addin, maybe in a better way than this one.
So the question is: which way will you choose?
I firmly believe Dynamo could be used for many many purposes, and addin-like behavior is one. First purpose of this tool is without a doubt computationnal design. But it is also a low-cost way of solving some problems and improve efficiency in Revit.
Definitions are easy to share and update. Users can tune them with only some basic Dynamo skill.

It is not the same with addins. It is a lot of work to manage and deploy. And users will not be able to tune things. Same thing for macros. On the other hand, addins are way more powerful and efficient….today.
Dynamo is not perfect, a huge effort is out on development: it is improved and fixed on a daily basis or so.

I don’t have an answer, but consider Dynamo in your trade. It may be worth.

Julien

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “API or not API: addins vs Dynamo in Revit

  1. Paolo Emilio Serra

    Julien,
    Dynamo is more fun indeed 🙂 As I don’t control it right now it seems to me that the solution you’re providing starts in multiple points in the diagram (while a macro is subsequential, row after row more or less) but still, Dynamo has a much more “human” friendly environment than SharpDevelop for macros (anyway I suggest to use Visual Studio, it helps a lot if you are still learning like me). The good thing about this tools is they allow common users to achieve a better understanding of what can and what can not be done (yet) within the software. The boundaries of this tools are still expanding, and the community of the people who starts to use them is expanding too, it’s a step closer to a new era in the design process.
    I’ll better start using Dynamo too, I don’t wan’t to stay behind 😀
    Keep learning, keep sharing the knowledge.

    Happy Holydays!

    -Paolo

    Reply
    1. jbenoit44 Post author

      Code and Dynamo are two faces of the same medal.I would argue that one day or the other Revit professional users will have to deal with one or both. Thank you for the comment and have a great Christmas time Paolo!

      Reply
  2. Pingback: Recent stories in Dynamo | AEC, you and me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s